tokenengine.ai
Structured Product Evaluator
info@tokenengine.ai

11.00% p.a. Multi Barrier Reverse Convertible (Callable) on AXA, ING & Munich Re

ISIN CH1593789535 SIX Symbol AHWVTQ Issued by Leonteq Securities AG (Guernsey Branch)
Structured Product Simulation Report · GJR-GARCH Monte-Carlo (10,000 paths)

1. Headline Simulation Results

Based on a GJR-GARCH Monte-Carlo simulation (10,000 paths, monthly steps, ~21-month horizon) applied to the three underlyings and the product's exact payoff logic:

8.15%
Expected annualized return
9.42%
Probability of a negative return
-27.07%
99% confidence VaR (1 year)
Metric Structured Product
Expected annualized return 8.15%
Expected total return over the (variable) holding period 7.39%
Expected holding period 13.01 months
Probability of a negative return 9.42%
Probability of a capital loss (principal repaid < 100%) 9.77%
99% confidence VaR (1 year) -27.07%
Probability of outperforming the risk-free rate (2.07%) 90.44%

The product delivers a stable ~11% p.a. coupon in the large majority of scenarios (90.23% of paths achieve an annualized return above 10%), but its downside is concentrated: in roughly one path in ten the worst-of basket breaches the 55% barrier and the investor suffers a double-digit capital loss.

2. Basic Product Information

How it works (plain language)

The investor receives an attractive fixed coupon (11% p.a.) for as long as the note is alive. At maturity:

3. Key Statistics

Metric (annualized) Structured Product Benchmark — equal-weight basket (total return, incl. dividends)
Expected return 8.15% 20.76%
Expected volatility 8.63% 23.59%
Probability of loss 9.42% 19.70%
99% VaR (1 year) -27.07% -24.41%

On a price-only basis the equal-weight basket has an expected annualized return of 16.18% and a 99% VaR of -28.99%; adding the ~4.58% average dividend yield lifts the basket's total return as shown above.

Note on annualization: annualized figures use the prescribed per-path method (CAGR for holding periods ≥ 12 months, linear scaling below 12 months). Because about half of the paths terminate before 12 months, annualizing their positive partial returns mechanically lifts the average. On a total (non-annualized) basis over the realised holding period, the basket's price return averages ~8.03% versus the product's 7.39% — i.e. the two are close over an equivalent horizon, and the wide gap between the two annualized means reflects the annualization convention as much as a genuine advantage.

Simulated frequency of outcomes (holding period and coupons)

4. Charts

Simulation outcomes — product vs underlying
Simulation outcomes — product vs underlying

Each point is one simulation; the horizontal axis is the basket's price return at the realised holding date and the vertical axis is the product's return. The capped structure is visible: generous returns cluster around +5% to +19% while the downside tracks (and can underperform) the 1:1 line once the barrier breaks.

Annualized return distributions
Product return histogram

The product's distribution is tightly bunched at ~+10–11% (coupon-driven) with a thin left tail.

Underlying return histogram

The underlying's distribution is far wider and more symmetric, reflecting full equity risk (the wide right tail reflects annualizing short holding periods).

Scenario probabilities
Scenario probabilities
Risk / return comparison
Risk return scatter

The product sits markedly to the left of the basket — materially lower volatility (8.63% vs 23.59%) but also materially lower expected return, and it carries a comparable-to-worse 99% VaR.

Annualized return box plot
Annualized return box plot
Holding period & coupon count
Holding period distribution
Number of coupons distribution

5. Investment Commentary

Observations (not advice)

Material modelling assumptions