Based on a GJR-GARCH Monte-Carlo simulation (10,000 paths, monthly steps, ~21-month horizon) applied to the three underlyings and the product's exact payoff logic:
| Metric | Structured Product |
|---|---|
| Expected annualized return | 8.15% |
| Expected total return over the (variable) holding period | 7.39% |
| Expected holding period | 13.01 months |
| Probability of a negative return | 9.42% |
| Probability of a capital loss (principal repaid < 100%) | 9.77% |
| 99% confidence VaR (1 year) | -27.07% |
| Probability of outperforming the risk-free rate (2.07%) | 90.44% |
The product delivers a stable ~11% p.a. coupon in the large majority of scenarios (90.23% of paths achieve an annualized return above 10%), but its downside is concentrated: in roughly one path in ten the worst-of basket breaches the 55% barrier and the investor suffers a double-digit capital loss.
The investor receives an attractive fixed coupon (11% p.a.) for as long as the note is alive. At maturity:
| Metric (annualized) | Structured Product | Benchmark — equal-weight basket (total return, incl. dividends) |
|---|---|---|
| Expected return | 8.15% | 20.76% |
| Expected volatility | 8.63% | 23.59% |
| Probability of loss | 9.42% | 19.70% |
| 99% VaR (1 year) | -27.07% | -24.41% |
On a price-only basis the equal-weight basket has an expected annualized return of 16.18% and a 99% VaR of -28.99%; adding the ~4.58% average dividend yield lifts the basket's total return as shown above.
Note on annualization: annualized figures use the prescribed per-path method (CAGR for holding periods ≥ 12 months, linear scaling below 12 months). Because about half of the paths terminate before 12 months, annualizing their positive partial returns mechanically lifts the average. On a total (non-annualized) basis over the realised holding period, the basket's price return averages ~8.03% versus the product's 7.39% — i.e. the two are close over an equivalent horizon, and the wide gap between the two annualized means reflects the annualization convention as much as a genuine advantage.
Each point is one simulation; the horizontal axis is the basket's price return at the realised holding date and the vertical axis is the product's return. The capped structure is visible: generous returns cluster around +5% to +19% while the downside tracks (and can underperform) the 1:1 line once the barrier breaks.
The product's distribution is tightly bunched at ~+10–11% (coupon-driven) with a thin left tail.
The underlying's distribution is far wider and more symmetric, reflecting full equity risk (the wide right tail reflects annualizing short holding periods).
The product sits markedly to the left of the basket — materially lower volatility (8.63% vs 23.59%) but also materially lower expected return, and it carries a comparable-to-worse 99% VaR.