tokenengine.ai
Structured Product Evaluator
info@tokenengine.ai

8.00% p.a. Multi Barrier Reverse Convertible (Callable) on Avolta, Richemont & Flughafen Zürich

ISIN CH1607593659 · CHF 1,000 denomination · Worst-of 3 Swiss equities · 55% continuous barrier · Issuer-callable · Maturity 27 Jul 2028

Headline Simulation Results

2.93%
Expected annualized return
16.91%
Probability of a negative return
−33.60%
99% confidence VaR (1 year)
11.45%
Expected annualized volatility
1.64%
Expected total return over realized holding period
14.67
Expected holding period (months, ≈1.22 years)
83.09%
Probability of beating the CHF risk-free rate (≈0%)

The product behaves like a high-coupon bond with a conditional capital-protection feature. In ~83% of simulated paths the total return is non-negative (the investor is repaid principal plus coupons and earns a smooth ~7.8%–8.0% annualized return); essentially all of the risk is concentrated in the ~17% of paths where a deep drawdown triggers the barrier and the redemption is delivered in the worst-performing stock.

Note: ~29% of paths terminate at the first call date (6 months). Because these short paths are annualized linearly, they produce a cluster of annualized returns at exactly 8.00%. Annualized figures on short holding periods should always be read together with the total return and holding period.

Basic Product Information

Feature Detail
Type Multi Barrier Reverse Convertible (Yield-Enhancement, SSPA 1230), Callable
Coupon 8.00% p.a., paid quarterly (CHF 20.00 per CHF 1,000; 7 payments)
Underlyings Avolta AG, Cie Financière Richemont SA, Flughafen Zürich AG (worst-of)
Strike / Barrier Strike 100%; Barrier 55%, continuously observed (worst-of)
Early redemption Issuer callable on 5 quarterly observation dates
Upside Capped at 100% (par) — no participation in gains
Issuer / Guarantor Leonteq Securities AG / Aargauische Kantonalbank (AA+)
How it works (in plain terms)

Key Risk & Return Statistics

Expected values from 10,000 Monte Carlo scenarios (21-month horizon). "Benchmark" is an equal-weight basket of the three underlyings.

Metric Structured Product Benchmark (same holding period) Benchmark (21-month buy & hold)
Expected annualized return 2.93% 14.39% 4.64%
Expected annualized volatility 11.45% 26.44% 17.33%
Probability of loss 16.91% 32.66% 40.97%
99% VaR (1 year) −33.60% −32.11% −32.16%
Expected total return 1.64% 6.68% 10.20%
Expected ann. return incl. dividends — 17.35% 7.60%

Reading the benchmark columns. Because the note is called early when the market is strong, the underlying basket's return measured over the note's same realized holding period is upward-biased (short, market-up windows annualized linearly), which is why its annualized figure (14.39%) exceeds the 21-month buy-and-hold figure (4.64%). The 21-month buy-and-hold column is the cleaner "hold the basket instead" comparison: over the note's full life the basket is expected to earn ~4.6% annualized (~7.6% with dividends), with ~41% chance of a loss and ~17% volatility.

Additional context: the product is called early in 50.97% of paths, a barrier event occurs in 18.97% of paths, the average number of coupons received is 4.89 (9.78 index points), and the 1st-percentile (99% VaR) annualized return is −33.60%.

Charts

Returns by simulation — product vs underlying

Each point is one scenario. The product's returns are pinned near a horizontal band (the coupon) and are capped well below the 1:1 line, while still sharing part of the underlying's downside. The 1:1 reference line highlights the give-up in upside.

Structured product vs underlying
Underlying basket annualized-return distribution

A wide, two-sided distribution driven by the underlying equities' volatility (annualized vol of the individual names ranges ~23%–44%).

Underlying distribution
Structured product annualized-return distribution

A tight, heavily right-skewed distribution: the bulk of scenarios cluster near +8%, with a thin but meaningful left tail to about −34% when the barrier is breached.

Structured product distribution
Scenario probabilities
Scenario probabilities
Risk / return profile (annualized)

The product sits far to the left of the benchmark points — substantially lower volatility — but also at a lower expected return, sitting above the (near-zero) cash rate.

Risk return
Annualized-return comparison
Box plot
Holding-period distribution
Years held
Coupon distribution
Coupons

About 29% of paths are called at the first opportunity (0.5 yr) and 49% run full term (1.75 yr); the remainder are spread across the intermediate call dates.

Investment Commentary

Potential merits
Points to weigh
Sensitivity — no-early-redemption baseline (ASSUMPTION): if one assumes the issuer never calls early and every path is held the full 21 months, the expected total return is higher (5.02% vs 1.64%) because the full coupon stream to maturity is received, while the expected annualized return is slightly lower (2.32% vs 2.93%) simply because every path is measured over the longer 21-month window. The loss probability is similar (18.68% vs 16.91%). In short, the call feature transfers value from total return (you exit early with fewer coupons) even as it shortens the average time-at-risk.

Figures are expressed in percentage terms and rounded to two decimals. Returns are simulated on the underlying price index (dividends added separately for comparison, without compounding). This document is an analysis of simulated outcomes and is not investment advice or a suitability assessment.