tokenengine.ai
Structured Product Evaluator   |   info@tokenengine.ai

Morgan Stanley SPXFP Market-Linked Notes due June 3, 2031 — Investment Analysis

Headline Simulation Results

Expected Annualized Return
11.15%
Structured product (vs 9.41% underlying benchmark)
Underlying benchmark 9.41%
Probability of Negative Return
0.00%
Structured product (vs 11.56% underlying benchmark)
Underlying benchmark 11.56%
99% VaR (1 year, annualized)
0.00%
Structured product (vs -9.99% underlying benchmark)
Underlying benchmark -9.99%
Metric Structured Product Underlying Benchmark (total return)
Expected annualized return 11.15% 9.41%
Probability of negative return 0.00% 11.56%
99% confidence VaR (1 year, annualized) 0.00% -9.99%
Expected annualized volatility 7.83% 7.66%
Conventions: "expected annualized return" is the mean of per-simulation annualized (CAGR) returns; "expected total return" is the mean of per-simulation 5-year total returns. These two averages differ because the payoff's downside floor makes the per-path return distribution non-linear (the mean of 5-year total returns exceeds what the mean CAGR implies when compounded).

Basic Product Information

How it works (in plain terms)

You invest $1,000 and receive no interest along the way. At maturity (June 3, 2031) the payoff depends only on how the reference index performed over the 5-year term:

  • If the index is UP by X%, you receive $1,000 × (1 + 130.5% × X) — 130.5% of any upside gain (e.g., +20% index → $1,261; +40% → $1,522).
  • If the index is FLAT or DOWN, you receive $1,000 back — principal is protected at maturity regardless of how far the index falls.

In short: full downside protection at maturity, plus leveraged and uncapped participation in positive index performance — in exchange for no income/dividends during the term and issuer credit exposure.


Key Statistics (annualized, 10,000 simulations)

Statistic Structured Product Underlying Benchmark (total return)
Expected annualized return 11.15% 9.41%
Median annualized return 11.11% 9.87%
Expected annualized volatility 7.83% 7.66%
Probability of loss 0.00% 11.56%
99% VaR (1-year, annualized) 0.00% -9.99%
99th percentile annualized return 29.02% 25.33%
Benchmark basis: the simulated index is the S&P 500 price index used as a proxy for the SPXFP futures excess-return index. For comparison purposes only, a "total-return" benchmark adds an estimated ~0.98% per year dividend proxy (as if invested in a S&P 500 ETF). The reference index itself (SPXFP) does not pay dividends. On a pure price-index basis (no dividend add-on), the benchmark's expected annualized return is 8.43% with a 99% VaR of -10.97%.

Charts

Simulation outcomes: structured product vs underlying (5-year returns)

Each point is one simulated 5-year outcome; the x-axis is the underlying price-index return (the value the note references). The dashed 1:1 line marks where note return equals underlying return — points above it benefit from the structure. Outcomes cluster on the 0% floor (par) and fan out above the 1:1 line due to the 130.5% participation.

Simulation scatter of structured product versus underlying 5-year returns
Annualized return distributions

The note's distribution is left-truncated at 0% (principal protection), whereas the underlying benchmark retains a wide left tail of loss outcomes.

Histogram of underlying benchmark annualized returns Histogram of structured product annualized returns
Scenario probabilities

Share of simulated paths ending at par, above the 10% annualized return threshold, and outperforming the risk-free rate of 3.73%.

Bar chart of scenario probabilities for the structured product
Risk / return profile

Expected annualized return versus volatility for the structured product and the underlying benchmark.

Risk return profile chart comparing product and underlying
Return distribution comparison

Boxplot comparing the dispersion of annualized returns between the structured product and the underlying benchmark.

Boxplot comparing return distributions

Investment Commentary

What the structure offers
Points to keep in mind
This analysis is a quantitative evaluation of the contractual payoff under simulated market scenarios. It does not constitute financial advice or a suitability assessment.