Headline Simulation Results
5.29%
Expected annualized return
24.68%
Probability of a negative return (realized total return < 0)
-32.94%
99% confidence VaR (1-year, annualized)
13.7 mo
Expected holding period (median 18 months)
3.77%
Expected total return over realized holding period (median 6.50%)
44.43%
Probability of early call (any observation date)
The product is a capital-at-risk yield note. Roughly one in four simulated outcomes ends with a loss, driven by the worst-of barrier. Annualized figures below should always be read together with the realized total return and holding period (see notes).
Product Overview & How It Works (Layman)
This is a 13.00% p.a. fixed-coupon note linked to the worst performer of three Swiss stocks (Kuehne + Nagel, Sulzer, VAT Group). It pays a generous coupon every quarter regardless of how the stocks move, in exchange for the investor taking downside risk on the weakest of the three names.
- Coupon: 13.00% p.a. (six quarterly coupons of CHF 32.50 per CHF 1,000, i.e. 3.25 points each; 19.5 points total if held to maturity).
- Downside protection (barrier 59%): If no stock ever trades at or below 59% of its starting level (observed continuously over the ~18-month life), capital is returned in full (100%).
- Knock-in risk: If any one stock touches the 59% barrier, protection is removed. At maturity you then receive par only if the worst-performing stock recovers to ≥100%; otherwise you are effectively delivered that worst stock and absorb its loss (value ≈ 100% × worst-stock performance).
- Issuer call: The issuer may redeem early (at par + the due coupon) on any of four quarterly observation dates. Calls typically happen when the worst-of is at/above its starting level — i.e. you get forced out precisely when the market is strong, capping your upside.
- Upside is capped: Beyond the fixed coupons, you do not participate in any rally.
Key Statistics (Annualized, per-horizon)
| Metric |
Structured Product |
Underlying Basket (total return)* |
| Expected annualized return |
5.29% |
15.24% |
| Expected annualized volatility |
13.55% |
25.93% |
| Probability of loss |
24.68% |
31.94% |
| 99% confidence VaR (1-year) |
-32.94% |
-28.64% |
* Equal-weight basket of the three stocks, including blended dividend yield (~2.24%). The basket's high per-horizon annualized return is not a full-period figure — see note.
Reading the numbers together: The structured product delivers a lower expected return than simply holding the basket, but with roughly half the volatility (13.55% vs 25.93%). Over the realized holding period the product's average total return is 3.77% versus 6.51% for the basket, and its worst-tail VaR (-32.94%) is only marginally deeper than the basket's (-28.64%) — a consequence of the worst-of barrier, which is harsher than a plain basket.
Note on annualization: ~44% of paths terminate early (called) during strong rallies; linearly annualizing those short holding periods inflates both instruments' mean annualized returns. As a sanity check, a fixed 18-month buy-and-hold of the basket averages ≈5.1% annualized price return (~7.3% with dividends), in line with the ~6% equity risk premium assumed.
Charts
Simulation Outcomes — Product vs Underlying (per-path, same holding period)
Each dot is one simulation; the diagonal is the 1:1 line. Points below the line are paths where the product underperformed the basket; the dense cluster near the top-left reflects the capped, coupon-driven return profile.
Annualized Return Distribution — Underlying Basket
Annualized Return Distribution — Structured Product
A tight distribution: outcomes are capped near ~+13% annualized (full coupons) with a fat left tail when the barrier is triggered.
Scenario Probabilities
Risk / Return Profile
The product sits far left of the basket: lower expected return, but materially lower volatility.
Annualized Return Comparison (Box Plot)
Holding Period Distribution
Number of Coupons Paid
Investment Commentary
Not financial advice. Figures are model-based estimates from a Monte Carlo simulation with an assumed ~6% equity risk premium; actual outcomes will differ.
Potential merits