I'll create a complete, professionally styled HTML report from this markdown content. ```html
Monte-Carlo of 20,000 paths, month-by-month, continuous 55% barrier.
The single most common outcome is the "designed" one: the note survives to maturity, pays all six coupons and repays par — an annualized return of ≈ 10.7%. Roughly one path in five (18.5%) ends in a capital loss, and when it does the average loss is about −30.8%. The distribution is therefore close to bimodal: a steady ≈ 11% coupon, punctuated by a sharp capital loss if the 55% barrier is breached and the worst share recovers only partially.
| Metric | Structured product | Underlying basket (total return) |
|---|---|---|
| Expected annualized return | 4.76% | 14.29% |
| Expected annualized volatility | 13.11% | 26.00% |
| Probability of loss | 18.52% | 33.46% |
| 99% confidence VaR (1 year) | −33.97% | −27.49% |
| Risk-free rate (CHF, 1-yr avg) | — | ≈ 0.00% (−0.05%) |
Note on horizon. The note is callable, so its holding period varies (6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 months). The underlying figures above are measured over the same realized holding period as the note, as required. This flatters the basket: the note is redeemed early precisely when the basket has rallied hard, so short, strongly-positive holding periods are over-represented. Measured instead as a plain 18-month buy-and-hold, the equal-weight basket returns 5.62% annualized (7.67% with dividends) — a more balanced reference point. Because the note's coupons are paid unconditionally, its own annualized return is stable (~11% when it does not lose money) and does not suffer the same distortion.
Each point is one simulation. The note hugs a band of fixed coupon outcomes and drops into losses once the barrier is breached.
Distribution of simulated annualized returns for the underlying equal-weight basket.
Distribution of simulated annualized returns for the structured product.
Probability of each terminal scenario, from full coupon-and-par redemption to capital impairment.
Expected annualized return plotted against expected annualized volatility.
Quartiles and tails of the simulated annualized return distribution.
Distribution of realized holding periods (left) and number of coupons received (right).
Number of quarterly coupons paid over the life of the note.
Figures are simulation outputs and are shown in percentage terms to two decimal places. This document is an analysis of the described terms and is not financial advice or a suitability assessment.
Points in favour