| Metric | Structured product | Underlying index |
|---|---|---|
| Expected annualized return | 10.53% | 13.90% |
| Probability of negative return | 0.00% | 6.88% |
| 99% confidence VaR (1 year) | 0.00% | −9.94% |
| Expected annualized volatility | 3.45% | 10.13% |
| Probability of beating the risk-free rate (3.73%) | 90.41% | — |
| Expected holding period | 1.82 years (≈ 22 months) | — |
| Expected total return over the realized holding period | 15.63% | 16.51% |
Reading the headline numbers. Because the note is fully principal-protected, its worst simulated outcome is simply the return of principal — so the probability of a negative return and the 1-year VaR are both 0.00% (on a hold-to-redemption basis). The median simulated annualized return is 12.00%, and 86.66% of paths end in an early redemption. The trade-off for that downside protection is a capped upside: strong equity rallies trigger the issuer's call, so the investor earns the fixed 12%-per-year accrual rather than the full equity gain.
This is a principal-protected, callable note. The investor's money is not exposed to losses from the index (principal is returned in full at maturity), but the note gives up regular income and parts of the upside in exchange for (i) a guaranteed repayment of principal and (ii) potential extra return.
| Expected annualized return | Expected annualized volatility | Probability of loss | 99% VaR (1 year) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structured product | 10.53% | 3.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Underlying index (excess-return) | 13.90% | 10.13% | 6.88% | −9.94% |
The underlying index is an excess-return index and does not distribute dividends, so no dividend adjustment applies to the benchmark comparison.
Each point is one simulated path; the dashed line is the 1-for-1 line. Almost all points sit on or above the 1:1 line on the downside (protection) and below it on the strong-upside side (the call caps gains).
Stacked by holding period.
Stacked by holding period.
Scenario probabilities for the structured product.
Risk and return positioning of the product versus the underlying index.
Dispersion of simulated annualized returns.
How the simulated holding periods are distributed, driven by early redemption.
This commentary is descriptive of the simulated results and is not investment advice or a suitability assessment.