Structured Product Evaluation Report  |  tokenengine.ai

8.00% p.a. Multi Barrier Reverse Convertible on Nestlé, Novartis, Sika

Simulation-based evaluation  |  CHF  |  worst-of  |  59% continuous barrier  |  issuer-callable  |  ISIN CH1607585481

4.56%
Expected annualized return
8.00% p.a.
Contractual coupon (unconditional)
14.69%
Probability of negative return (annualized < 0)
−25.28%
99% confidence VaR (1 year)

1. Headline simulation results

Metric Structured product
Expected annualized return 4.56%
Probability of negative return (annualized < 0) 14.69%
99% confidence VaR (1 year) −25.28%
Expected annualized volatility 8.25%
Expected total return over the realized holding period 6.61%
Expected holding period 19.3 months (1.61 years)
Probability of a positive annualized return 85.31%
Probability of a capital-preserved outcome (par redemption, annualized return ≥ 7%) 84.61%

The product is very likely to deliver close to its 8.00% p.a. coupon (median simulated annualized return 7.70%), but it carries a fat left tail: in roughly 1 year in 6 the worst-of basket breaches the barrier and the investor takes a capital loss. Because upside is capped while downside is not fully shielded once the barrier breaks, the product's 1%-tail loss (−25.28%) is worse than that of simply holding the underlying basket (−14.52%).

2. How the product works (plain language)

Modelling note: the issuer's call is discretionary (no contractual trigger). It is modelled as exercised whenever the worst-of level is at or above 100% (strike) on a call date.

3. Key statistics — product vs. underlying

Metric Structured product Underlying basket (total return)
Expected annualized return 4.56% 11.43%
Expected annualized volatility 8.25% 13.35%
Probability of loss (annualized < 0) 14.69% 20.16%
99% confidence VaR (1 year) −25.28% −14.52%

Benchmark = equally-weighted basket of Nestlé, Novartis and Sika, including their average dividend yield (~3.04%). The worst-of of the three names, for reference, has an expected annualized return of −3.12% and volatility of 13.68%.

Read-through: the product offers a lower expected return than holding the basket directly (4.56% vs 11.43%), buys a large reduction in volatility (8.25% vs 13.35%) and a lower day-to-day probability of loss (14.69% vs 20.16%), but its extreme-tail loss is deeper because the barrier converts a "worst-of" decline into a direct capital loss once breached, while the coupon caps the upside at ~8% p.a.

4. Charts

Simulated outcomes — product vs. underlying

Scatter plot, colour = years held.

Simulated outcomes — product vs. underlying (scatter, colour = years held)
Underlying basket — simulated annualized total returns

1% bins, stacked by holding period.

Underlying basket — simulated annualized total returns
Structured product — simulated annualized returns

1% bins, stacked by holding period.

Structured product — simulated annualized returns
Risk / return map
Risk / return map
Annualized return distribution
Annualized return distribution
Scenario probabilities for the structured product
Scenario probabilities for the structured product
Probability of holding period (years)
Probability of holding period in years
Probability of number of coupons paid
Probability of number of coupons paid

5. Hold-period and coupon behaviour

6. Investment commentary

Points in favour

Points to weigh


Note: the coupon is contractual and unconditional (paid on every scheduled date); the 84.61% figure above refers to a capital-preserved, “full-value” outcome (par redemption and/or early call with coupon intact), not to the coupon itself.

Figures are simulated (monthly steps, 20,000 paths, GJR-GARCH with fat tails) and shown to two decimal places; percentages are annualized unless stated otherwise.