tokenengine.ai Structured Product Evaluator info@tokenengine.ai

12.60% p.a. Multi Barrier Reverse Convertible (Callable)

on ABB, Adecco & Barry Callebaut  —  ISIN CH1607588964

Headline Simulation Results

10,000 Monte-Carlo scenarios over the 18-month maximum term (worst-of barrier structure, 55% continuous barrier, issuer-callable).

7.93%
Expected annualized return
13.98%
Probability of a negative return
-30.81%
99% confidence VaR (1-year)
13.82
Expected holding period (months)
7.99%
Expected total return over the holding period
12.60%
Median total return
Headline Metric Result
Expected annualized return7.93%
Probability of a negative return13.98%
99% confidence VaR (1-year)-30.81%
Expected holding period13.82 months
Expected total return over the holding period7.99%
Median total return12.60%
The 12.60% p.a. coupon is contractual and paid in every scenario (subject only to the issuer's credit), totalling 18.90 coupon points if held to maturity. Losses therefore arise only in the minority of paths where the 55% barrier is breached and the worst-performing share finishes below its starting level.

Product at a Glance

How It Works (in plain English)

The investor lends CHF 5,000 of par to the issuer and, in exchange, receives an above-market 12.60% annual coupon, paid unconditionally at each quarterly date. To pay for that high coupon the investor sells the issuer downside protection on the worst-performing of the three Swiss shares:

Because both the barrier and the maturity redemption are driven by the worst of ABB, Adecco and Barry Callebaut, the structure is more fragile than any single share on its own — even though the coupon itself is fixed.

Key Risk / Return Statistics

Metric (annualized) Structured Product Underlying (Equal-Weight Basket, Total Return)
Expected annualized return 7.93% 14.07%
Expected annualized volatility 11.41% 21.80%
Probability of loss 13.98% 33.38%
99% confidence VaR (1-year) -30.81% -25.57%

(Benchmark = equal-weight basket of the three shares; a ~2.72% dividend yield is added for the total-return comparison.)

Reading these numbers: the product delivers a much steadier ride than owning the basket — roughly half the volatility (11.4% vs 21.8%) and a loss probability under 15% vs. over 33%. In exchange, upside is capped (max ~12.6% p.a.) and, because the payoff is tied to the worst share, the deepest tail loss (-30.8% annualized at the 1st percentile) is worse than the basket's (-25.6%). On an annualized basis the product's expected return (7.93%) is clearly below the basket's (14.07%); however, on an un-annualized basis the two are much closer — the product's expected total return (7.99%) is actually slightly above the basket's expected total return over the same variable horizons (6.21%), because the fixed coupon cushions the many flat-to-down scenarios. The large gap in the annualized figures is driven largely by the fact that the product is often called early in strong rallies — precisely the paths in which the basket's annualized return is mechanically exaggerated (see note below).

Early-redemption / barrier behaviour
Outcome Probability
Called early by the issuer43.10%
Barrier (55%) breached at least once15.08%
Held the full 18 months to maturity56.90%
Received all 6 coupons56.90%

Charts

Simulation Outcomes — Product vs Benchmark
Scatter plot of product versus benchmark total returns

Each point is one scenario: the structured product's total return (y) versus the equal-weight basket's total return (x), coloured by holding period. Points above the dashed 1:1 line are scenarios where the product beat buying the basket.

Risk / Return Positioning
Risk and return scatter positioning

The product sits meaningfully to the left of the basket — about half the volatility — while carrying a lower annualized expected return, and it stands well above the (near-zero) risk-free rate.

Scenario Probabilities
Scenario probabilities chart
Distribution of Annualized Returns
Histogram of benchmark annualized returns Histogram of product annualized returns

The product's distribution is tightly capped at +12.6% with a modest negative tail; the basket's has a much wider two-sided spread.

Box Plot Comparison
Box plot comparison of annualized returns
Holding Period and Coupon Counts
Pie chart of holding period distribution Pie chart of number of coupons received

Investment Commentary

Potential strengths
Points to weigh
Note on annualized figures for short holding periods: ~25% of scenarios are redeemed after only 6 months, and these occur predominantly when the market has rallied strongly (the basket averaged +18% over those 6 months). Simple annualization multiplies such moves by two, which mechanically inflates the benchmark's annualized return. Expected total return and expected holding period should therefore be read alongside the annualized numbers.

Assumptions