tokenengine.ai  |  Structured Product Evaluator

11.00% p.a. Multi Barrier Reverse Convertible (Worst-of) — Richemont · Logitech · Sonova

ISIN: CH1607600389 | SIX Symbol: AIJRTQ | Currency: CHF | Issuer: Leonteq Securities AG (Guernsey Branch) | Final Fixing: 04/05/2028
4.26%
Expected Annualized Return
Mean of per-path annualized returns (median 10.72%)
19.56%
Probability of a Negative Return
Roughly 2 out of 10 simulated scenarios
−35.80%
99% Confidence 1-Year VaR
Worst case in simulation ≈ −49%

Headline Simulation Results

Based on 10,000 simulated 18-month market scenarios for the three underlyings:

Metric Result
Expected annualized return 4.26%
Median annualized return 10.72%
Probability of a negative return 19.56%
99% confidence 1-year VaR −35.80%
Expected holding period ≈ 14.0 months
Probability of early redemption (call) 40.71%

The product pays an attractive headline coupon, but the distribution of outcomes is bimodal: in roughly 8 out of 10 scenarios the investor earns about the coupon rate (~11% annualized), while in about 2 out of 10 the knock-in barrier is breached and the investor suffers a large loss. The low mean return (4.26%) versus the much higher median (10.72%) reflects that a minority of severe-loss scenarios drag the average down.

How It Works (in plain language)

You invest CHF 1,000 (100% of notional). Over an 18-month term you collect 11.00% p.a. paid as six quarterly coupons of CHF 27.50 (2.75% each) — and the coupons are paid regardless of how the stocks perform.

Upside is capped at par plus the fixed coupons — you do not participate in any rally of the shares.

Key Statistics: Product vs. Underlying Basket

The benchmark is an equal-weight basket of the three stocks (total return, i.e. including dividends ≈ 1.78% on average).

Instrument Exp. Ann. Return Exp. Ann. Volatility Prob. of Loss 99% VaR (1-yr)
Structured Product 4.26% 13.81% 19.56% −35.80%
Underlying (equal-weight basket, total return) 14.56% 27.28% 33.77% −31.46%

Risk-free reference (1-year average CHF short rate): ≈ −0.05% (effectively zero).

Note on return figures. "Expected annualized return" is the average of each simulation's annualized return (per-path CAGR; linear annualization when a path is held under 12 months). Because ~41% of paths are called early — some after only 6 months — the average total return over the realized ~14-month holding period (+3.37% for the product, +6.47% price / ≈+8.5% incl. dividends for the basket) annualizes to a lower figure (≈+2.9% and ≈+7% p.a. respectively) than the average of per-path annualized returns (4.26% and 14.56%). The gap is driven by strong short-dated basket rallies being annualized upward. Both views are shown so total return and holding period are interpreted together.

Charts

Product vs. Underlying Return (per simulation)

Points on the 1:1 line mean the product matched the basket. The dense cluster at the top shows the product's return capped near +11% even when the basket rallies, while in down markets the product's worst-of structure can underperform.

Product vs Underlying scatter plot
Structured Product — Annualized Return Distribution

A near point-mass around +10.7% to +11% (the coupon-driven outcome) with a separate loss tail down to roughly −49%. Bars are colored by holding period.

Structured Product annualized return histogram
Underlying Basket — Annualized Total Return Distribution

A wide distribution. Note: some very short early-call paths have linearly-annualized returns above +100% (max ≈ +164%); the x-axis is truncated at +100% for readability.

Underlying basket annualized total return histogram
Risk / Return Comparison

The product sits well below the underlying's return for less risk, and only marginally above the (near-zero) risk-free rate in expectation.

Risk return scatter plot
Annualized Return Box Plot
Annualized return box plot comparison
Scenario Probabilities
Scenario probabilities chart
  • Worst case (negative return): 19.56%
  • Best case (annualized return > 10%, i.e. capturing the coupon): 80.27%
  • Outperforming the risk-free rate: 80.44%
Holding Period & Coupon Outcomes

The product is called early in ~41% of scenarios (most frequently at month 6), otherwise it runs to the 18-month maturity.

Holding period pie chart Coupon count pie chart

Redemption Outcome Breakdown

Outcome Probability
Early redemption by issuer (par + coupons to date) 40.71%
Held to maturity — no barrier hit (par + all coupons) 39.51%
Held to maturity — barrier hit but worst ≥ start (par) 0.04%
Held to maturity — barrier hit & worst < start (redemption below par) 19.74%
A sub-par redemption (19.74%) is not always a negative total return: adding the 16.5 coupon points can keep small shortfalls positive, which is why the negative-return probability (19.56%) is slightly below the sub-par frequency.

Investment Commentary

Favorable points
  • A high 11.00% p.a. coupon in a market where CHF cash rates are ~0%, with coupons paid unconditionally on each date (absent an early call).
  • A relatively deep 55% knock-in barrier, so the shares must fall more than 45% before protection is lost.
  • Roughly 40% of scenarios return full par at maturity, and the typical (median) outcome is about +10.7% annualized.
  • Short expected duration (~14 months) and lower volatility than holding the shares directly.
Points to weigh
  • Worst-of exposure across three correlated Swiss stocks makes a bad outcome more likely than for a single name — the investor is tied to whichever stock performs worst.
  • Upside is fully capped; the basket's simulated expected total return (~14.6% p.a.) is materially higher than the product's (~4.3% p.a.), and the product's expected return is only modestly above cash.
  • Asymmetric downside: when the barrier is breached and the worst stock ends below its start, losses are severe (99% VaR −35.8%, worst case ≈ −49%) — larger in magnitude than the basket's own VaR.
  • The issuer call feature tends to end the product early precisely when the shares are performing, truncating the high-coupon stream.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or a suitability assessment.